Exercise - GP2 Team Management

  • Due Sep 15, 2023 at 5pm
  • Points 100
  • Available Sep 12, 2023 at 8am - Sep 16, 2023 at 5pm
This assignment is part of the module Day 7 - (Sep 12) Non-Functional Reqs & Org Impact and hasn't been unlocked yet.

Completion Prerequisites

The following requirements need to be completed before this page will be unlocked:

    Rubric

    Keep in mind that 96 students have already been assessed using this rubric. Changing it will affect their evaluations.
    Team Management Rubric - GP2
    Team Management Rubric - GP2
    Criteria Ratings Pts
    Team listed all teammates in their analysis
    threshold: pts
    5 pts Full Marks
    0 pts No Marks
    pts
    5 pts
    --
    Each person's Enneagram is listed with number and name
    threshold: pts
    5 pts Full Marks
    3 pts Missing either the number or the name of the Enneagram type
    0 pts No Marks
    pts
    5 pts
    --
    Each person included thoughtful strengths
    Strengths considered are specific to the group member, not a copy/paste of an Enneagram description.
    threshold: pts
    15 pts Full Marks
    10 pts Strengths are general and not specific/explained by student
    0 pts No Marks
    pts
    15 pts
    --
    Each person included thoughtful stressors
    Stressors considered are specific to the group member, not a copy/paste of an Enneagram description.
    threshold: pts
    15 pts Full Marks
    10 pts Stressors are general and not specific/explained by student
    0 pts No Marks
    pts
    15 pts
    --
    The team provided useful insights from analyzing their types
    The insights identified are specific to the Enneagram types identified by the team
    threshold: pts
    15 pts Full Marks
    10 pts Team did not consider Enneagram types
    0 pts No Marks
    pts
    15 pts
    --
    The team put effort and thoughtfulness into considering potential opportunities for excellence
    The opportunities identified are specific to the Enneagram types identified by the team
    threshold: pts
    15 pts Full Marks
    10 pts Team did not consider Enneagram types
    0 pts No Marks
    pts
    15 pts
    --
    The team put effort and thoughtfulness into considering potential conflicts
    The potential conflicts identified are specific to the Enneagram types identified and analyzed by the team (not general challenges faced by all teams such as difficulty in scheduling meetings)
    threshold: pts
    15 pts Full Marks
    10 pts Team did not consider Enneagram types
    0 pts No Marks
    pts
    15 pts
    --
    Team provided thoughtful and actionable ideas on how they would address “symptoms” or conflicts before they become “problems”
    Team considered Enneagram types when suggesting ideas
    threshold: pts
    15 pts Full Marks
    10 pts Team did not consider Enneagram types
    0 pts No Marks
    pts
    15 pts
    --