CP Delivery 2: Report Quality and Progress on Final Documents

Due No Due Date
Points 100

This is not for submitting your assignment.

This assignment is a placeholder for your D2 Report Quality and Progress on Final Documents grade

Rubric

Title:

Keep in mind that 96 students have already been assessed using this rubric. Changing it will affect their evaluations.

Interim Status - Report Quality and Progress on Final Documents - FA23

Interim Status - Report Quality and Progress on Final Documents - FA23
Criteria	Ratings	Pts
Updated Costs - Original _7416 Include the original cost for the chosen solution (not the entire eval table). Describe any cost changes/updates and why or note if there were no changes threshold: pts Edit criterion description	3 to >2.0 pts Included only the original costs for the chosen solution _4425 2 to >1.0 pts Included only the original costs for all proposed solutions from Inception _1648 1 to >0 pts Included the entire evaluation table for the chosen solution or all proposed solutions _9920 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.	pts / 3 pts --
Updated Budget - Updates _7461 threshold: pts Edit criterion description	1 to >0.5 pts Clearly identified any changes/updates to the costs. Included note if no changes were made. _4719 0.5 to >0 pts Indicated changes/updates to the costs but unclear what aspects are affected. Missing note if no changes were made. _2737 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.	pts / 1 pts --
User Materials - Access to materials _7439 threshold: pts Edit criterion description	3 to >2.0 pts Included correct links or instructions to access all user materials (e.g. tool tips, instructions embedded into system) for prof to access _2747 2 to >1.0 pts Included correct links or instructions to access ¾ or more of user materials (e.g. tool tips, instructions embedded into system) for prof to access _134 1 to >0 pts Included correct links or instructions to access less than ¾ of user materials (e.g. tool tips, instructions embedded into system) for prof to access _3334 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.	pts / 3 pts --
User Materials - Alignment of type _6484 threshold: pts Edit criterion description	4 to >2.5 pts Types of user materials created completely aligns with type of materials proposed in change management exercise and is appropriate for client situation _8188 2.5 to >1.0 pts Types of user materials created somewhat aligns with type of materials proposed in change management exercise OR are not appropriate for client situation _7082 1 to >0 pts Types of user materials created does not align with type of materials proposed in change management exercise and are not appropriate for client situation _741 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.	pts / 4 pts --
User Materials - Content _2339 threshold: pts Edit criterion description	4 to >2.5 pts User material content identified in change management exercise included for all completed user stories and is appropriate for client situation _9255 2.5 to >1.0 pts User material content identified in change management exercise included for most completed user stories and is appropriate for client situation _897 1 to >0 pts User material content identified in change management exercise included for some completed user stories OR is not appropriate for client situation _8841 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.	pts / 4 pts --
User Materials - Professionalism _8483 threshold: pts Edit criterion description	3 to >2.0 pts User materials are professionally created, easy to navigate, easy to access, intuitive to read/follow, and appropriate for the client situation _7605 2 to >1.0 pts One of the following is not met: user materials are professionally created, easy to navigate, easy to access, intuitive to read/follow, or appropriate for the client situation _5372 1 to >0 pts More than one of the following is not met: user materials are professionally created, easy to navigate, easy to access, intuitive to read/follow, or appropriate for the client situation _1654 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.	pts / 3 pts --
System Admin Materials - Access to materials _534 threshold: pts Edit criterion description	3 to >2.0 pts Included correct links or instructions to access all admin materials for prof to access _5603 2 to >1.0 pts Included correct links or instructions to access ¾ or more admin materials for prof to access _6599 1 to >0 pts Included correct links or instructions to access less than ¾ of admin materials for prof to access _6081 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.	pts / 3 pts --
System Admin Materials - Alignment of type _4913 threshold: pts Edit criterion description	4 to >2.5 pts Types of admin materials created completely aligns with type of materials proposed in change management exercise and is appropriate for client situation _5048 2.5 to >1.0 pts Types of admin materials created somewhat aligns with type of materials proposed in change management exercise OR are not appropriate for client situation _6859 1 to >0 pts Types of admin materials created does not align with type of materials proposed in change management exercise and are not appropriate for client situation _744 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.	pts / 4 pts --
System Admin Materials - Content _5997 threshold: pts Edit criterion description	4 to >2.5 pts Admin material content identified in change management exercise included for all completed user stories and is appropriate for client situation _1837 2.5 to >1.0 pts Admin material content identified in change management exercise included for most completed user stories and is appropriate for client situation _1029 1 to >0 pts Admin material content identified in change management exercise included for some completed user stories OR is not appropriate for client situation _1312 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.	pts / 4 pts --
System Admin Materials - Professionalism _8626 threshold: pts Edit criterion description	3 to >2.0 pts Admin materials are professionally created, easy to navigate, easy to access, intuitive to read/follow, and appropriate for the client situation _5717 2 to >1.0 pts One of the following is not met: admin materials are professionally created, easy to navigate, easy to access, intuitive to read/follow, or appropriate for the client situation _6190 1 to >0 pts More than one of the following is not met: admin materials are professionally created, easy to navigate, easy to access, intuitive to read/follow, or appropriate for the client situation _1438 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.	pts / 3 pts --
Training Plan and Materials - Plan _7864 Describe of your plan for training, including training logistics (who, what, where, when), and an outline for the training itself for relevant roles (e.g. user, admin, devs). Include links to additional materials that you have created for the training (e.g. PPT slides, exercises, training videos – anything beyond what you have created for user and system admin materials). threshold: pts Edit criterion description	3 to >2.0 pts Included a clear and well thought out plan for training including who, what, when, where for completed user stories _1307 2 to >1.0 pts Included a clear and well thought out plan for training but missing 1 of the following: who, what, when, where for completed user stories _3946 1 to >0 pts Plan for training is vague and missing details OR is clear and well thought out plan but missing 2 or more of the following: who, what, when, where for completed user stories _6324 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.	pts / 3 pts --
Training Plan and Materials - Session Outlines _7970 threshold: pts Edit criterion description	3 to >2.0 pts Included a detailed outline for each training session for relevant roles (e.g. user, admin, dev) for completed user stories _3512 2 to >1.0 pts Included a detailed outline for each training session for completed user stories, but is not clear what roles are affected _4835 1 to >0 pts Included a broad outline for each training session for completed user stories _3226 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.	pts / 3 pts --
Training Plan and Materials - Assessment _3306 threshold: pts Edit criterion description	2 to >1.0 pts Included a detailed explanation for how to measure whther training is effective (i.e. how do you know that the users/admin/dev learned and understands their tasks?) _4954 1 to >0 pts Included a vague explanation for how to measure whther training is effective (i.e. how do you know that the users/admin/dev learned and understands their tasks?) _4178 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.	pts / 2 pts --
Training Plan and Materials - Links to additional materials _9603 threshold: pts Edit criterion description	3 to >1.5 pts Included links to all additional materials created beyond existing user and admin materials as needed to be used in the training (e.g. PPT slides, exercises, additional training videos) _2459 1.5 to >0 pts Included links to some additional materials created beyond existing user and admin materials as needed to be used in the training (e.g. PPT slides, exercises, additional training videos) _4352 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.	pts / 3 pts --
Developer Materials - Access _9324 threshold: pts Edit criterion description	3 to >2.0 pts Included correct links or instructions to access all developer materials for prof to access _4276 2 to >1.0 pts Included correct links or instructions to access ¾ or more developer materials for prof to access _69 1 to >0 pts Included correct links or instructions to access less than ¾ of developer materials for prof to access _9445 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.	pts / 3 pts --
Developer Materials - Alignment of type _7697 threshold: pts Edit criterion description	3 to >2.0 pts Types of developer materials created completely aligns with type of materials proposed in change management exercise and is appropriate for client situation _9297 2 to >1.0 pts Types of developer materials created somewhat aligns with type of materials proposed in change management exercise OR are not appropriate for client situation _4458 1 to >0 pts Types of developer materials created does not align with type of materials proposed in change management exercise and are not appropriate for client situation _1614 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.	pts / 3 pts --
Developer Materials - Content _9516 threshold: pts Edit criterion description	3 to >2.0 pts Developer material content identified in change management exercise included for all completed user stories and is appropriate for client situation _4612 2 to >1.0 pts Developer material content identified in change management exercise included for most completed user stories and is appropriate for client situation _856 1 to >0 pts Developer material content identified in change management exercise included for some completed user stories OR is not appropriate for client situation _2649 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.	pts / 3 pts --
Developer Materials - Organization _3238 threshold: pts Edit criterion description	3 to >2.0 pts Developer guide well-organized and easy for client to navigate (e.g. table of contents for a single document; intuitive folder structure if using Google Drive) _4864 2 to >1.0 pts Developer guide somewhat organized to support client navigation (e.g. table of contents too high-level for a single document; folder structure broad if using Google Drive) _8147 1 to >0 pts Developer guide not organized to support client navigation (e.g. missing table of contents for a single document; folder structure not intuitive if using Google Drive) _9975 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.	pts / 3 pts --
Developer Materials - Installation/Setup _7341 threshold: pts Edit criterion description	3 to >2.0 pts Installation/Setup steps (required) – included all detailed steps your team followed to setup the software environment(s); someone without knowledge of the system can correctly follow the steps without asking questions _9333 2 to >1.0 pts Installation/Setup steps (required) – some detailed steps your team followed to setup the software environment(s) are missing; someone without knowledge of the system would need to ask questions to follow the steps _971 1 to >0 pts Installation/Setup steps (required) – general guidance/overview of installation provided, and someone without system knowledge would need significant assistance to install system _9491 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.	pts / 3 pts --
Developer Materials - Environment _5875 threshold: pts Edit criterion description	3 to >2.0 pts Environment details clearly explained (if relevant) (e.g. sandbox, production, other production issues) _4324 2 to >1.0 pts Environment details generally explained (if relevant) (e.g. sandbox, production, other production issues) _3518 1 to >0 pts Environment details vaguely explained (if relevant) (e.g. sandbox, production, other production issues) OR missing necessary environment details required for client situation _8691 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.	pts / 3 pts --
Developer Materials - Go-live/deployment _5924 threshold: pts Edit criterion description	3 to >2.0 pts Go-live steps clearly describe the process of deploying the system (end of sprints and/or project) and include a list of detailed steps with owners and timings (e.g. before, during, after deployment); includes instructions for backing up data and the system; someone without knowledge of the system can correctly follow the steps without asking questions _5520 2 to >1.0 pts Go-live steps generally describe the process of deploying the system (end of sprints and/or project) and include a list of general steps with owners and timings (e.g. before, during, after deployment); includes instructions for backing up data and the system; someone without knowledge of the system would need to ask questions to follow the steps _6966 1 to >0 pts Vague description of go-live steps and process, missing details related to actual tasks and timing, missing instructions for backing up data and the system, someone without system knowledge would need significant assistance to install system _1361 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.	pts / 3 pts --
Developer Materials - Config/Coding/IO Standards _8095 threshold: pts Edit criterion description	3 to >2.0 pts Configuration, styling, and/or coding standards as well as I/O standards (data validation) clearly defined as needed for all aspects of the system completed as of D2 _3651 2 to >1.0 pts Configuration, styling, and/or coding standards as well as I/O standards (data validation) clearly defined for most aspects of the system completed as of D2 _2441 1 to >0 pts Missing clearly defined configuration, styling, and/or coding standards as well as I/O standards (data validation) for many aspects of the system completed as of D2 _1263 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.	pts / 3 pts --
Developer Materials - Passwords _4443 threshold: pts Edit criterion description	3 to >2.0 pts Details on how to acquire password and login information to all systems is provided, and temporary passwords are strong (i.e. at least 8 characters and include letters and numbers) _2320 2 to >1.0 pts Only one of the following provided: details on how to acquire password and login information to all systems OR temporary passwords are strong (i.e. at least 8 characters and include letters and numbers) _2457 1 to >0 pts Vague description of how to acquire password and login information; temporary passwords are weak _3044 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.	pts / 3 pts --
Developer Materials - Change code/configuration _9453 threshold: pts Edit criterion description	3 to >2.0 pts Clear details/steps included for how to edit and update the code or software configuration for parts of the system that have been completed; someone without knowledge of the system can correctly follow the steps without asking questions _5622 2 to >1.0 pts Clear details/steps included for how to edit and update the code or software configuration for most completed system parts; someone without knowledge of the system can correctly follow the steps without asking questions _1789 1 to >0 pts General guidance included for how to edit and update the code or software configuration; someone without knowledge of the system would need to ask questions to edit or update the code/software configuration _5180 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.	pts / 3 pts --
Developer Materials - To-be concept diagram _7534 threshold: pts Edit criterion description	3 to >1.5 pts To-Be Concept diagram included with any relevant updates to reflect changes made since Inception _7324 1.5 to >0 pts To-Be Concept diagram included but missing relevant updates to reflect changes made since Inception _9472 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.	pts / 3 pts --
Developer Materials - System Architecutre Diagram _7852 threshold: pts Edit criterion description	3 to >2.0 pts Clear and correct System Architecture Diagram (if applicable) _880 2 to >1.0 pts Clear System Architecture Diagram with improvements needed (if applicable) _4780 1 to >0 pts Missing System Architecture Diagram for projects where it is important to help understand how the solution works _2474 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.	pts / 3 pts --
Developer Materials - Web Flow Diagram _7834 threshold: pts Edit criterion description	3 to >2.0 pts Web Flow diagram (if applicable) included with updates since Inception _5804 2 to >1.0 pts Web Flow diagram (if applicable) included but doesn’t align with current version of the website _5861 1 to >0 pts Web Flow diagram not included but client solution includes a website _3775 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.	pts / 3 pts --
Developer Materials - ERD _9132 threshold: pts Edit criterion description	3 to >2.0 pts ERD (if applicable) included with updates since Inception _4164 2 to >1.0 pts ERD (if applicable) included but doesn’t align with current version of the database _4330 1 to >0 pts ERD not included but client solution includes a database _4615 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.	pts / 3 pts --
Developer Materials - Professionalism _3660 threshold: pts Edit criterion description	3 to >2.0 pts Developer materials are professionally created, easy to access, intuitive to read/follow, and appropriate for the client situation _1951 2 to >1.0 pts One of the following is not met: developer materials are professionally created, easy to access, intuitive to read/follow, or appropriate for the client situation _7574 1 to >0 pts More than one of the following is not met: developer materials are professionally created, easy to access, intuitive to read/follow, or appropriate for the client situation _8745 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.	pts / 3 pts --
Report Quality/Professionalism - Page breaks _346 threshold: pts Edit criterion description	3 to >2.0 pts Included page breaks between all sections as appropriate _7955 2 to >1.0 pts Included page breaks between most sections as appropriate _5057 1 to >0 pts Included page breaks between few sections as appropriate _233 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.	pts / 3 pts --
Report Quality/Professionalism - Table headers _6781 threshold: pts Edit criterion description	1.5 to >1.0 pts For all tables, table headers repeat on the next page if a table is split across two pages _3669 1 to >0.5 pts For most tables, table headers repeat on the next page if a table is split across two pages _9938 0.5 to >0 pts For few tables, table headers repeat on the next page if a table is split across two pages _4081 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.	pts / 1.5 pts --
Report Quality/Professionalism - Table columns _5304 threshold: pts Edit criterion description	1.5 to >1.0 pts For all tables, table columns are sized appropriately and do not squeeze/stretch words _2238 1 to >0.5 pts For most tables, table columns are sized appropriately and do not squeeze/stretch words _4712 0.5 to >0 pts For some tables, table columns are sized appropriately and do not squeeze/stretch words _6603 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.	pts / 1.5 pts --
Report Quality/Professionalism - Table font _6178 threshold: pts Edit criterion description	1.5 to >1.0 pts For all tables, table font is appropriate size – feel free to user smaller font to improve readability _6092 1 to >0.5 pts For most tables, table font is appropriate size – feel free to user smaller font to improve readability _7609 0.5 to >0 pts For some tables, table font is appropriate size – feel free to user smaller font to improve readability _2428 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.	pts / 1.5 pts --
Report Quality/Professionalism - Font size _9624 threshold: pts Edit criterion description	1.5 to >1.0 pts Font size for entire report is appropriate, consistent, and enhances readability (between 10-12 pt depending on selected font) _624 1 to >0.5 pts Font size for most of the report is appropriate, consistent and enhances readability (between 10-12 pt depending on selected font) _2919 0.5 to >0 pts Font size for some of the report is appropriate, consistent and enhances readability (between 10-12 pt depending on selected font) _5511 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.	pts / 1.5 pts --
Report Quality/Professionalism - Formatting _675 threshold: pts Edit criterion description	3 to >2.0 pts Formatting throughout the entire report is professional, consistent and enhances readability _4738 2 to >1.0 pts Formatting throughout most of the report is professional, consistent and enhances readability _9064 1 to >0 pts Formatting throughout some of the report is professional, consistent and enhances readability _2146 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.	pts / 3 pts --
Description of criterion threshold: 5 pts Edit criterion description Delete criterion row	5 to >0 pts Full Marks blank 0 to >0 pts No Marks blank_2 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.	pts / 5 pts --

Rubric

Title:

Find a Rubric

Title

Title
Criteria	Ratings	Pts
Description of criterion threshold: 5 pts Edit criterion description Delete criterion row	5 to >0 pts Full Marks blank 0 to >0 pts No Marks blank_2 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.	pts / 5 pts --
Description of criterion threshold: 5 pts Edit criterion description Delete criterion row	5 to >0 pts Full Marks blank 0 to >0 pts No Marks blank_2 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.	pts / 5 pts --