CP Delivery 1: Planning/Team Management

Due No Due Date
Points 100

This is a "placeholder" assignment for tracking the Planning and Team Management portion of Delivery 1: Solution Analysis.

You do not submit anything here.

Please submit your Delivery 1 here: Client Project Delivery 1 - Solution Analysis

Rubric

Title:

Keep in mind that 96 students have already been assessed using this rubric. Changing it will affect their evaluations.

Solution Analysis - Planning and Team Management

Solution Analysis - Planning and Team Management
Criteria	Ratings	Pts
Project Timeline - All stories included _8586 Follow the guidelines discussed in class and the reading to determine the order of user stories as well as the number of user stories planned for each sprint. Move stories into the appropriate sprint and update the sprint number and the planned start and end date of each sprint (NOTE: a sprint should typically last 1 week in the client project). threshold: pts Edit criterion description	3 to >2.0 pts All user stories included in sprints or backlog _1972 2 to >1.0 pts ¾ or more user stories included in sprints or backlog _2158 1 to >0 pts Less than ¾ user stories included in sprints or backlog _7137 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.	pts / 3 pts --
Project Timeline - 1 week sprints with dates _1587 threshold: pts Edit criterion description	3 to >2.0 pts Sprints last 1 week and start/end dates noted _2214 2 to >1.0 pts Appropriate sprint length but inconsistent start/end dates (e.g. sprints overlap or gaps between sprints) _2612 1 to >0 pts Sprints last longer or shorter than 1 week OR Missing start/end dates in timeline _3395 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.	pts / 3 pts --
Project Timeline - Aligns with Timeline and Feasibility Matrix _9996 threshold: pts Edit criterion description	3 to >2.0 pts Order of user stories planned per week aligns with project timeline guidelines and Feasibility Matrix _2381 2 to >1.0 pts Order of user stories aligns with guidelines in 4 of 5 sprints and mostly aligns with Feasibility Matrix _2634 1 to >0 pts Order of user stories aligns with guidelines in less than 4 sprints and/or minimally aligns with Feasibility Matrix _3548 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.	pts / 3 pts --
Project Timeline - Follows timline guidelines _1401 threshold: pts Edit criterion description	3 to >2.0 pts Each sprint includes a maximum of 3 points of user stories _196 2 to >1.0 pts Each sprint includes a maximum of 3 points of user stories in 4 of 5 sprints _755 1 to >0 pts Each sprint includes a maximum of 3 points of user stories in less than 4 sprints _5725 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.	pts / 3 pts --
Trello Board - Inception - Work completed _7586 Demonstrate the use of the Solution Analysis Trello board to manage the Inception process and deliverables. threshold: pts Edit criterion description	3 to >2.0 pts Indicates that all planned work for the Solution Analysis has been marked as completed _6188 2 to >1.0 pts ¾ or more of planned Solution Analysis work has been marked as completed _9154 1 to >0 pts Less than ¾ of planned Solution Analysis work has been marked as completed _6474 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.	pts / 3 pts --
Trello Board - Inception - Completed on time _6424 threshold: pts Edit criterion description	3 to >2.0 pts All planned deliverables completed on time _5639 2 to >1.0 pts ¾ or more of completed deliverables are finished on time _2246 1 to >0 pts Less than ¾ of completed deliverables are finished on time _2309 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.	pts / 3 pts --
Trello Board - Inception - Client active in Trello _9644 threshold: pts Edit criterion description	3 to >2.0 pts Client actively approving work in Trello during all weeks of Inception _9030 2 to >1.0 pts Client actively approving work just before Inception concludes (primarily during Week 4) _9939 1 to >0 pts Client approving minimal work in Trello _3252 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.	pts / 3 pts --
Trello Board - Inception - Entire team active in Trello _7825 threshold: pts Edit criterion description	3 to >2.0 pts Entire team involved in managing work completed in Trello _9916 2 to >1.0 pts 1-2 team members missing in managing work completed in Trello _3140 1 to >0 pts Only 1-2 team members managing work completed in Trello _7683 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.	pts / 3 pts --
Trello Board - Inception - Tasks updated as completed _364 threshold: pts Edit criterion description	3 to >2.0 pts Tasks updated regularly (as they are completed) throughout Inception _579 2 to >1.0 pts Tasks updated weekly throughout Inception _5861 1 to >0 pts Tasks updated in 1-3 chunks during Inception (e.g. at the end of Week 2 and the end of Inception) _9268 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.	pts / 3 pts --
Trello Board - User Stories - Clear owners and distribution of work _5425 Create a work breakdown structure (WBS) for each user story using Trello. Assign team members and estimate completion dates for each card in the first sprint. Ensure you are planning to test throughout each sprint threshold: pts Edit criterion description	3 to >2.0 pts Clear owners of all work to be completed in Sprint 1 (and current sprint) and clear distribution of work among all team members _458 2 to >1.0 pts Clear owners of ¾ or more of work to be completed in Sprint 1 AND/OR 1-2 members not clearly owning work _6074 1 to >0 pts Clear owners of less than ¾ of work to be completed in Sprint 1 AND/OR Only 1-2 people assigned to own work _6809 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.	pts / 3 pts --
Trello Board - User Stories - Deadlines added to all cards _1924 threshold: pts Edit criterion description	3 to >2.0 pts Deadlines added to every card in Sprint 1 (and current sprint) _5984 2 to >1.0 pts Deadlines added to ¾ of cards in Sprint 1 (and current sprint) _4982 1 to >0 pts Deadlines added to less than ¾ of cards in Sprint 1 (and current sprint) _6362 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.	pts / 3 pts --
Trello Board - User Stories - Work completed by specified date _3083 threshold: pts Edit criterion description	3 to >2.0 pts Indicates that all work planned to be completed by the date when prof grades has been completed _2744 2 to >1.0 pts Indicates that ¾ or more of work planned to be completed by the date when prof grades has been completed _8596 1 to >0 pts Indicates that less than ¾ of work planned to be completed by the date when prof grades has been completed _4254 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.	pts / 3 pts --
Trello Board - User Stories - Following work breakdown structure described in Sprint Kickoff meeting _3619 threshold: pts Edit criterion description	3 to >2.0 pts Use of Trello completely aligns with description provided in Sprint Kickoff presentation _1055 2 to >1.0 pts All but one aspect of the use of Trello fully aligns with description provided in Sprint Kickoff presentation _4444 1 to >0 pts Only some aspects of the use of Trello fully aligns with description provided in Sprint Kickoff presentation _9061 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.	pts / 3 pts --
Trello Board - User Stories - User Stories assigned to sprints/backlog _3658 threshold: pts Edit criterion description	3 to >2.0 pts Every user story assigned to sprints or backlog using Trello labels _1286 2 to >1.0 pts ¾ or more user stories assigned to sprints or backlog using Trello labels _8467 1 to >0 pts Less than ¾ of user stories assigned to sprints or backlog using Trello labels _9364 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.	pts / 3 pts --
Trello Board - User Stories - Ties to Project Timeline _8954 threshold: pts Edit criterion description	3 to >2.0 pts Sprints, backlog and user stories tie perfectly to project timeline _1174 2 to >1.0 pts ¾ or more sprints, backlog and user stories tie to project timeline _5670 1 to >0 pts Less than ¾ of sprints, backlog and user stories tie to project timeline _7628 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.	pts / 3 pts --
Weekly Rituals - Agendas _3236 threshold: pts Edit criterion description	3 to >2.0 pts Client Meeting Agendas – each agenda includes Trello screenshot; all agendas stored on Box throughout Inception _1553 2 to >1.0 pts Agendas include Trello screenshots; agendas mostly uploaded to Box at the end of Inception _8372 1 to >0 pts Agendas missing Trello screenshots and relevant meeting details; mostly uploaded to Box at the end of Inception _6045 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.	pts / 3 pts --
Weekly Rituals - Retrospectives _2713 threshold: pts Edit criterion description	3 to >2.0 pts Completed at least 3 out of 4 weekly retrospectives in Mural Weekly Retrospectives _3409 2 to >1.0 pts Completed 2 out of 4 weekly retrospectives in Mural Weekly Retrospectives _8346 1 to >0 pts Completed 1 out of 4 weekly retrospectives in Mural Weekly Retrospectives _9233 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.	pts / 3 pts --
Weekly Rituals - Status calculations _5262 threshold: pts Edit criterion description	3 to >2.0 pts Completed all 4 % Actual vs. % Planned calculations correctly, provided thoughtful comments and stored in Mural _5157 2 to >1.0 pts Completed all 4 % Actual vs. % Planned calculations but misused the template (e.g. bad calculations, didn’t provide comments) _7316 1 to >0 pts Completed 1 to 3 % Actual vs. % Planned calculations correctly with comments AND/OR misused the template (e.g. bad calculations, didn’t provide comments) _3852 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.	pts / 3 pts --
Weekly Rituals - Trello screenshots _4487 threshold: pts Edit criterion description	3 to >2.0 pts Added all 4 Weekly Trello screenshots to Mural at the end of each week of Inception _1010 2 to >1.0 pts Added 3 Weekly Trello screenshots to Mural at the end of each week of Inception _3953 1 to >0 pts Added less than 3 Weekly Trello screenshots to Mural at the end of each week of Inception _2328 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.	pts / 3 pts --
Prototype Iterations _4068 Create at least 3 versions (iterations) of a prototype with your client during inception. Capture your client’s feedback on each version. threshold: pts Edit criterion description	1.5 to >1.0 pts Client feedback provided for each prototype _4510 1 to >0.5 pts Client feedback provided for more than half of prototypes _2696 0.5 to >0 pts Client feedback provided for less than half of prototypes _9210 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.	pts / 1.5 pts --
Prototype Iterations _9022 threshold: pts Edit criterion description	1.5 to >1.0 pts Client feedback incorporated between all prototype versions _5407 1 to >0.5 pts Client feedback incorporated between more than half of prototypes _2285 0.5 to >0 pts Client feedback incorporated between less than half of prototypes _9533 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.	pts / 1.5 pts --
Prototype Iterations _2441 threshold: pts Edit criterion description	1 to >0.5 pts Type of prototype relevant for determining requirements and scope _7936 0.5 to >0 pts Type of prototype not relevant for determining requirements and scope _9742 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.	pts / 1 pts --
Prototype Iterations _9952 threshold: pts Edit criterion description	1.5 to >1.0 pts At least 3 iterations of the prototype included _9514 1 to >0.5 pts Only 2 iterations of the prototype included _2509 0.5 to >0 pts Only 1 iteration of the prototype included _7758 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.	pts / 1.5 pts --
Prototype Iterations _7552 threshold: pts Edit criterion description	1.5 to >1.0 pts Prototype iterations done over time (e.g. Weeks 2 through 4) _4959 1 to >0.5 pts Prototype iterations occurred in last 3 meetings with client _2542 0.5 to >0 pts Prototype iterations occurred only at end of Inception _6400 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.	pts / 1.5 pts --
Sprint Kickoff Meeting - General - Original request _9616 To begin the meeting, please start with a quick review of the key components of the analysis your team performed mostly for the Professor’s sake but also as a recap for the client. threshold: pts Edit criterion description	1.5 to >1.0 pts Clearly addressed the original project request, included excellent visuals for the request, and managed time (not too long, not too quickly) _5091 1 to >0.5 pts Only did 2 of the following 3 things well: clearly addressed the original project request, included excellent visuals for the request, managed time (not too long, not too quickly) _9388 0.5 to >0 pts Did at most 1 of the following 3 things well: clearly addressed the original project request, included excellent visuals for the request, managed time (not too long, not too quickly) _4341 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.	pts / 1.5 pts --
Sprint Kickoff Meeting - General - Root cause _7945 threshold: pts Edit criterion description	1.5 to >1.0 pts Clearly recapped the root cause analysis, included excellent visuals for the root cause, and managed time (not too long, not too quickly) _9383 1 to >0.5 pts Only did 2 of the following 3 things well: Clearly recapped the root cause analysis, included excellent visuals for the root cause, and managed time (not too long, not too quickly) _3774 0.5 to >0 pts Did at most 1 of the following 3 things well: Clearly recapped the root cause analysis, included excellent visuals for the root cause, and managed time (not too long, not too quickly) _3093 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.	pts / 1.5 pts --
Sprint Kickoff Meeting - General - Proposed scope _852 threshold: pts Edit criterion description	1.5 to >1.0 pts Clearly covered proposed scope, included excellent visuals for the proposed scope, and managed time (not too long, not too quickly) _1397 1 to >0.5 pts Only did 2 of the following 3 things well: clearly covered proposed scope, included excellent visuals for the proposed scope, and managed time (not too long, not too quickly) _3264 0.5 to >0 pts Did at most 1 of the following 3 things well: clearly covered proposed scope, included excellent visuals for the proposed scope, and managed time (not too long, not too quickly) _7333 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.	pts / 1.5 pts --
Sprint Kickoff Meeting - General - Feasibility Matrix _4602 threshold: pts Edit criterion description	1.5 to >1.0 pts Clearly covered the Feasibility Matrix, included excellent visuals for the Feasibility Matrix, and managed time (not too long, not too quickly) _4101 1 to >0.5 pts Only did 2 of the following 3 things well: clearly covered the Feasibility Matrix, included excellent visuals for the Feasibility Matrix, and managed time (not too long, not too quickly) _5703 0.5 to >0 pts Did at most 1 of the following 3 things well: clearly covered the Feasibility Matrix, included excellent visuals for the Feasibility Matrix, and managed time (not too long, not too quickly) _6116 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.	pts / 1.5 pts --
Sprint Kickoff Meeting - General - Risks _7210 threshold: pts Edit criterion description	1.5 to >1.0 pts Clearly covered relevant risks, included excellent visuals for relevant risks, and managed time (not too long, not too quickly) _1949 1 to >0.5 pts Only did 2 of the following 3 things well: clearly covered relevant risks, included excellent visuals for relevant risks, and managed time (not too long, not too quickly) _8554 0.5 to >0 pts Did at most 1 of the following 3 things well: clearly covered relevant risks, included excellent visuals for relevant risks, and managed time (not too long, not too quickly) _6772 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.	pts / 1.5 pts --
Sprint Kickoff Meeting - General - Eval Table _3868 threshold: pts Edit criterion description	1.5 to >1.0 pts Clearly covered top 2-3 solutions, included excellent visuals for eval table, and managed time (not too long, not too quickly) _7113 1 to >0.5 pts Only did 2 of the following 3 things well: clearly covered 2-3 solutions, included excellent visuals for eval table, and managed time (not too long, not too quickly) _8417 0.5 to >0 pts Did at most 1 of the following 3 things well: clearly covered 2-3 solutions, included excellent visuals for eval table, and managed time (not too long, not too quickly) _6110 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.	pts / 1.5 pts --
Sprint Kickoff Meeting - Sprint logistics - Sprint activities _5574 Explain 1) how you’re structuring your team and communication and 2) how sprints will be executed. We want to ensure everyone fully understands the expectations of the client and student team members during the sprint process. It is critical that your team and your client clearly understand how the work is shifting and identify your client’s roles and responsibilities during sprints. threshold: pts Edit criterion description	4 to >2.5 pts High-level overview of sprint activities provided with specific explanation of how client is impacted and when they're involved _1416 2.5 to >1.0 pts High-level overview of sprint activities provided, but a specific explanation of how client is impacted OR when they're involved is missing _783 1 to >0 pts High-level overview of sprint activities provided, but specific explanations of how client is impacted AND when they're involved is missing _1615 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.	pts / 4 pts --
Sprint Kickoff Meeting - Sprint logistics - Timeline _3453 threshold: pts Edit criterion description	2 to >1.5 pts Shared clearly legible project timeline, explained all of the following: how timeline is structured (sprints each week), how timeline was derived, how stories were selected for each sprint _2928 1.5 to >1.0 pts Shared clearly legible project timeline, and explained 2 of the following: how timeline is structured (sprints each week), how timeline was derived, how stories were selected for each sprint _3835 1 to >0 pts Shared project timeline that was not easy to read, AND/OR explained 0 or 1 of the following: how timeline is structured (sprints each week), how timeline was derived, how stories were selected for each sprint _8671 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.	pts / 2 pts --
Sprint Kickoff Meeting - Sprint logistics - Team testing _2535 threshold: pts Edit criterion description	3 to >2.0 pts Brief explanation of how team testing will work for the specific client situation, along with timing as it relates to the client _2856 2 to >1.0 pts Brief explanation of how team testing will work for the specific client situation, but missing timing as it relates to the client _2608 1 to >0 pts Explanation of how team testing will work is vague (not specific to client situation) and timing as it relates to the client is missing _7036 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.	pts / 3 pts --
Sprint Kickoff Meeting - Sprint logistics - UAT _8916 threshold: pts Edit criterion description	3 to >2.0 pts Thorough explanation of how user acceptance will work and the date by which sprint 1 UAT will occur _3238 2 to >1.0 pts Thorough explanation of how user acceptance testing will work but missing date by which sprint 1 UAT will occur _9730 1 to >0 pts General/vague explanation of how user acceptance testing will work _3228 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.	pts / 3 pts --
Sprint Kickoff Meeting - Sprint logistics - Training _9781 threshold: pts Edit criterion description	3 to >2.0 pts Thorough explanation of training will work and the date by which sprint 1 training will occur _4470 2 to >1.0 pts Thorough explanation of how training will work but missing date by which sprint 1 training will occur _3361 1 to >0 pts General/vague explanation of how training will work _7710 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.	pts / 3 pts --
Sprint Kickoff Meeting - Sprint logistics - Team use Trello _4166 threshold: pts Edit criterion description	3 to >2.0 pts Thorough explanation of how work will be captured and tracked in Trello during sprints _7427 2 to >1.0 pts Included all but one aspect of how work will be captured and tracked (work breakdown structure, marking work complete, team testing, UAT, bug tracking, client signoff) _6036 1 to >0 pts Missing more than one aspect of how work will be captured and tracked (work breakdown structure, marking work complete, team testing, UAT, bug tracking, client signoff) _6103 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.	pts / 3 pts --
Sprint Kickoff Meeting - Sprint logistics - Client use Trello _8338 threshold: pts Edit criterion description	3 to >2.0 pts Clearly explained how client will interact with Trello during sprints (signing off on user stories) _4330 2 to >1.0 pts Clearly explained most aspects of how client will interact with Trello during sprints (missing at least 1 important aspect) _466 1 to >0 pts Missing several aspects of how client will interact with Trello during sprints OR Vague explanation of how client will interact with Trello during sprints _4657 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.	pts / 3 pts --
General Inception Quality - Professionalism _613 threshold: pts Edit criterion description	1.5 to >1.0 pts Professional presentation of all analysis performed in Murals and all external documents _7262 1 to >0.5 pts Professional presentation of most analysis performed in Murals and most external documents (2-3 spelling/grammar/layout/font errors) _3383 0.5 to >0 pts More than 3 errors in analysis performed in Murals and external documents (2-3 spelling/grammar/layout/font errors) _8023 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.	pts / 1.5 pts --
General Inception Quality - Attention to client situation _4085 threshold: pts Edit criterion description	1.5 to >1.0 pts Excellent attention to the reality of the client’s situation _4419 1 to >0.5 pts Attention to the reality of the client’s situation missing from 1 area of analysis _9818 0.5 to >0 pts Attention to the reality of the client’s situation missing from more than 1 area of analysis _2557 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.	pts / 1.5 pts --
General Inception Quality - Quality of recommendations _1170 threshold: pts Edit criterion description	1.5 to >1.0 pts Team demonstrated creativity and provided thoughtful recommendations _3563 1 to >0.5 pts Some recommendations were creative and thoughtful while others were generic and not well thought-through _9380 0.5 to >0 pts Team’s recommendations were generic and not well thought-through _7954 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.	pts / 1.5 pts --
General Inception Quality - Cohesion _2717 threshold: pts Edit criterion description	1.5 to >1.0 pts Excellent cohesion between all elements in the Solution Analysis (story is clear, logical, and easy to follow) _5946 1 to >0.5 pts Excellent cohesion between all but 1 element in the Solution Analysis _8827 0.5 to >0 pts Missing cohesion between more than 1 element in the Solution Analysis _1097 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.	pts / 1.5 pts --
Description of criterion threshold: 5 pts Edit criterion description Delete criterion row	5 to >0 pts Full Marks blank 0 to >0 pts No Marks blank_2 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.	pts / 5 pts --

Rubric

Title:

Find a Rubric

Title

Title
Criteria	Ratings	Pts
Description of criterion threshold: 5 pts Edit criterion description Delete criterion row	5 to >0 pts Full Marks blank 0 to >0 pts No Marks blank_2 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.	pts / 5 pts --
Description of criterion threshold: 5 pts Edit criterion description Delete criterion row	5 to >0 pts Full Marks blank 0 to >0 pts No Marks blank_2 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.	pts / 5 pts --